Stage 11 to 2 weeks
AI Opportunity Sprint
Teams who know AI matters but not where to start.
A short, structured discovery that finds the AI opportunities worth pursuing in your business, and the ones that aren't.
Find your AI opportunityAI evaluation & LLMOps
Works for systems we build and for AI features your team or another vendor already shipped.
AI systems do not stay the same after launch. Models are updated or retired, your data changes, users find new edge cases and costs creep up. Without evaluation and monitoring, you find out when a customer complains.
A prompt tweak or provider-side model update changes behaviour, and nobody notices until answers are wrong in production.
New models could be cheaper or better, but without a test suite nobody can prove it, so teams stay on ageing versions.
Token spend grows with usage and longer prompts. Without per-feature visibility, bills arrive before explanations.
Leadership, customers or auditors ask who can access the system, what it logged and how it is controlled, and the evidence is scattered.
Build a representative test set and automated scoring so every change is measured before release.
Sample and score live outputs, track user feedback and alert on drops in quality or spikes in failures.
Add input and output checks, topic limits, personal-data redaction and prompt-injection defences around an existing system.
Profile usage, introduce caching and model routing, trim context and set budgets without sacrificing measured quality.
Move to a newer or different model with side-by-side evaluation, staged rollout and a rollback plan.
Access reviews, audit trails, data-flow documentation and incident procedures ready for internal or customer review.
Curated test cases from real usage, with rubric-based, reference-based and model-graded scoring where each fits.
Evaluations run automatically in your delivery pipeline, blocking releases that regress beyond agreed limits.
Request traces, token usage, latency, error rates and feedback in dashboards your team can read.
Reusable pre- and post-processing checks for safety, format, personal data and policy compliance.
Role-based access to AI tools and admin functions, with tamper-evident logs of prompts, outputs and actions.
Incident response steps, monthly quality and cost reviews, and a roadmap of improvements.
The usual suspects. If yours has an API or a database, we can almost certainly work with it.
We review the system, its data flows and risks, then build an evaluation set that reflects how it is really used.
Tracing, cost tracking and feedback capture are added so every request can be understood later.
Guardrails and access controls are added where the risk review shows they are needed.
Live outputs are sampled and scored, with alerts for quality, cost or latency moving outside agreed ranges.
Monthly reviews turn findings into changes to prompts, retrieval, models or UX, each proven on the evaluation set before release.
The scenario: A support assistant runs on an older model. A newer model promises lower cost, but the team cannot risk worse answers.
Timings are typical for a first release. They depend on scope, how ready your data is and the integrations involved, so we confirm them after discovery.
We assess architecture, prompts, data flows, access, costs and failure modes, and deliver a prioritised risk and improvement list.
We build the test set, scorers, dashboards and alerts, and wire evaluations into your release process.
We implement the highest-priority controls from the review and document them.
Ongoing monitoring, monthly quality and cost reviews, model and dependency updates, and support when something goes wrong.
Security, privacy, testing and human control are designed in from the start, not bolted on after a pilot. We adapt them to your policies and your risk.
Prompts, retrieval settings and models are versioned. Nothing ships without an evaluation run against the agreed thresholds.
Review queues and approval steps are monitored too. We track override rates to spot where the AI needs help or where humans are rubber-stamping.
Who can use, configure and view the logs of each AI system is explicit, reviewed and recorded.
Kill switches, fallbacks and a documented incident process let you turn off or degrade an AI feature quickly and safely.
The goal is AI you can reason about. We report against baselines agreed in the review, typically covering:
Evaluation scores per release, Live quality samples and feedback, Cost per request and per feature, Incidents and time to resolve.
We don't promise savings or accuracy figures up front. We measure them on your data during the pilot.
Stage 11 to 2 weeks
Teams who know AI matters but not where to start.
A short, structured discovery that finds the AI opportunities worth pursuing in your business, and the ones that aren't.
Find your AI opportunityStage 23 to 5 weeks
One valuable workflow you want to prove before scaling.
A focused pilot that automates a single workflow end to end, running against a measured baseline so the result is a decision, not a demo.
Start an AI pilotStage 36 to 12 weeks
An AI product or feature you are ready to ship to real users.
A full build from product design to deployment: the AI, the application around it, the integrations and the tooling to run it.
Plan a production buildStage 4Ongoing, monthly
AI systems already in production that need an owner.
Ongoing care for production AI: we watch quality, control costs, handle model changes and keep security reviews current.
Talk about managed AIAn AI evaluation suite is a set of representative test cases plus automated scoring that measures how well an AI system performs. Running it before every change shows whether quality improved, stayed the same or regressed.
Yes. We start with a system review, then add evaluation, monitoring and controls around the existing system before making larger changes.
Guardrails are checks around an AI model, on its inputs, outputs and actions, that enforce format, safety, privacy and business policy, for example blocking personal data leaks or out-of-scope requests.
We measure first, then apply caching, smaller models for simpler steps, shorter context, batching and budgets, and check each change on the evaluation suite so savings do not cost accuracy.
Yes. Managed AI Operations is a monthly engagement covering monitoring, reviews, model updates, cost controls, security reviews and support.
Tell us what it does and what worries you about it. We'll suggest where evaluation, monitoring or guardrails would help most. We reply within one business day.
We reply within one business day, and we're happy to sign an NDA first. Prefer email? Write to info@originsphere.in.